With it the currrent application processor portfolio of Allwinner is:Įarlier information was provided in the Allwinner A23 Dual-Core SoC: The most efficient one in its low-end category post.
ALLWINNER A33 BENCHMARK FULL
It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs A133 and Helio P22, as well as read the test results at the links below.Ĭ - All about any processors and chips: desktop CPU, mobile SoC, GPU.Allwinner announced its SoC roadmap on which contained the following exact details for the A23 SoC: Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table.
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P22 is better: 23 The number of parameters for which Allwinner A133 is better: 11 We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has. The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption. Another difference is that A133 has 4 more core than Helio P22. Here Helio P22 is 19% better than A133 in terms of CPU frequency. In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores.
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performanceĭDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4GbĢx LPDDR4 up to 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHzĢx LPDDR4(X) ? 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 ? 933MHz Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) A133Īntutu 8 Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed Summary benchmark results As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
ALLWINNER A33 BENCHMARK SOFTWARE
A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.įrom the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as Octane V2, GFXBench, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.Īfter reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy A133 or Helio P22 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2. Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. This performance comparison involves two processors: A133 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and Helio P22 is octa-core (Cortex-A53). Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks Allwinner A133 vs MediaTek Helio P22, speed testing of GPUs PowerVR GE8320 and PowerVR GE8300.
0 kommentar(er)
